How Dretske responds to Chisholm's claim that intentionality cannot be Essay

How Dretske responds to Chisholms claim that intentionality cannot be naturalized - Essay ExampleChisholm argued that intentionality cannot be naturalized because of the numerous influencing factors that strangle us. According to Locke Chisholm argued that for every decision we correct there must be a factor that influences or alters a persons quests or will. He further argued that every decision we make is based on the fact that we must take the line to be comfortable. According to Chisholm factors affecting a persons intent may also be psychological. This also denies the possibility that intentionality can be natural. To naturalize intentionality Chisholm argued that there must be utterly free will in an action. In his parentage need and wants of the people does not allow what single(a)s do to be natural. For instance, a persons need for victuals, shelter and clothing makes geniuss intention to acquire the commodities an bionic intent. In this scenario, the intent can onl y be natural if one could survive without food and still have the intent and urge to acquire the commodity. ... For instance, one can refer it to natural intentionality when a person takes an alternative option when tackling an issue but as artificial intentionality when the individual chooses another option based on threats or any other influencing factor. Chisholm argued that intentionality cannot be naturalized because of the numerous influencing factors that surround us. According to Locke Chisholm argued that for every decision we make there must be a factor that influences or alters a persons needs or will (87). He further argued that every decision we make is based on the fact that we must take the path to be comfortable. According to Chisholm factors affecting a persons intent may also be psychological (Locke 102). This also denies the possibility that intentionality can be natural. To naturalize intentionality Chisholm argued that there must be absolutely free will in an ac tion. In his argument need and wants of the people does not allow what individuals do to be natural. For instance, a persons need for food, shelter and clothing makes ones intention to acquire the commodities an artificial intent (Locke 92). In this scenario, the intent can only be natural if one could survive without food and still have the intent and urge to acquire the commodity. According to Chisholm intentionality is built on artificial factors that domain cannot evade. The only possibility to have naturalized intentionality is whereby an individual s considered free spirit in his environment. Locke defines a free spirit by arguing that a free spirit is a form of an individual who does not require influence from any environmental factor to make their decision (112). According to the motive this scenario is practically impossible. From this perspective,